# Articles for week 32 2026 ## Anisotropic Particle Transport from a Pulsar Wind Nebula Revealed by Einstein Probe and LHAASO [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07850v1) ### Authors - Zhen Cao / F. Aharonian / Y. X. Bai / Y. W. Bao - D. Bastieri / X. J. Bi / Y. J. Bi / W. Bian - J. Blunier / A. V. Bukevich / C. M. Cai / W. Y. Cao - Zhe Cao / J. Chang / J. F. Chang / E. S. Chen - G. H. Chen / H. K. Chen / L. F. Chen / Liang Chen - Long Chen / M. J. Chen / M. L. Chen / Q. H. Chen - S. Chen / S. H. Chen / S. Z. Chen / T. L. Chen - X. B. Chen / X. J. Chen / X. P. Chen / Yang Chen - Yong Chen / N. Cheng / Q. Y. Cheng / Y. D. Cheng - Y. H. Chi / M. Y. Cui / S. W. Cui / X. H. Cui - Y. D. Cui / B. Z. Dai / H. L. Dai / L. X. Dai - Z. G. Dai / Danzengluobu / Y. X. Diao / A. J. Dong - X. D. Duan / J. H. Fan / Y. Z. Fan / J. Fang - J. H. Fang / K. Fang / C. F. Feng / H. Feng - L. Feng / S. H. Feng / X. T. Feng / Y. Feng - Y. L. Feng / S. Gabici / B. Gao / Q. Gao - W. Gao / C. Ge / M. M. Ge / T. T. Ge - L. S. Geng / G. Giacinti / G. H. Gong / Q. B. Gou - M. H. Gu / W. M. Gu / F. L. Guo / J. Guo - K. J. Guo / X. L. Guo / Y. Q. Guo / R. P. Han - O. A. Hannuksela / M. Hasan / H. H. He / H. N. He - J. Y. He / X. Y. He / Y. He / S. Hernández-Cadena - C. Hou / X. Hou / H. B. Hu / S. C. Hu - D. H. Huang / F. Huang / J. J. Huang / X. L. Huang - X. T. Huang / X. Y. Huang / Y. Huang / Z. J. Huang - A. Inventar / X. L. Ji / H. Y. Jia / K. Jia - S. M. Jia / H. B. Jiang / K. Jiang / X. W. Jiang - Z. J. Jiang / C. C. Jin / M. Jin / S. Kaci - M. M. Kang / I. Karpikov / D. Khangulyan / D. Kuleshov - K. Kurinov / W. H. Lei / Cheng Li / C. K. Li - Cong Li / D. Li / F. Li / H. B. Li - H. C. Li / Jian Li / Jie Li / K. Li - L. Li / R. L. Li / T. Y. Li / W. L. Li - X. R. Li / X. Y. Li / Y. Li / Zhe Li - Zhuo Li / E. W. Liang / Y. F. Liang / S. J. Lin - B. Liu / C. Liu / D. Liu / D. B. Liu - H. Liu / J. Liu / J. L. Liu / J. R. Liu - M. Y. Liu / Q. Liu / R. Y. Liu / S. M. Liu - T. Liu / W. Liu / Y. Liu / Y. Liu - Yuan Liu / Y. N. Liu / Y. Q. Lou / Q. Luo - Y. Luo / H. K. Lv / B. Q. Ma / L. L. Ma - X. H. Ma / I. O. Maliy / J. R. Mao / Z. Min - W. Mitthumsiri / Y. Mizuno / G. B. Mou / A. Neronov - C.-Y. Ng / K. C. Y. Ng / M. Y. Ni / L. Nie - L. J. Ou / Z. W. Ou / H. W. Pan / P. Pattarakijwanich - Z. Y. Pei / D. Y. Peng / J. C. Qi / M. Y. Qi - J. J. Qin / H. Qu / A. Raza / C. Y. Ren - M. Q. Ruan / D. Ruffolo / A. Sáiz / D. Savchenko - D. Semikoz / L. Shao / O. Shchegolev / Y. Z. Shen - X. D. Sheng / F. W. Shu / H. C. Song / Yu. V. Stenkin - Y. Su / C. Y. Sun / D. X. Sun / H. Sun - J. X. Sun / M. Sun / Q. N. Sun / X. N. Sun - Z. B. Sun / N. H. Tabasam / J. Takata / P. H. T. Tam - H. B. Tan / Q. W. Tang / R. Tang / Z. B. Tang - L. Tao / W. W. Tian / C. N. Tong / L. H. Wan - C. Wang / D. H. Wang / G. W. Wang / H. G. Wang - J. C. Wang / J. F. Wang / J. S. Wang / K. Wang - Kai Wang / Kai Wang / L. P. Wang / L. Y. Wang - W. Wang / X. G. Wang / X. J. Wang / X. Y. Wang - Y. Wang / Y. D. Wang / Z. H. Wang / Z. X. Wang - Zheng Wang / D. M. Wei / J. J. Wei / Y. J. Wei - T. Wen / S. S. Weng / C. Y. Wu / H. R. Wu - Q. W. Wu / S. Wu / X. F. Wu / Y. S. Wu - S. Q. Xi / J. Xia / G. M. Xiang / D. X. Xiao - G. Xiao / Y. F. Xiao / B. H. Xie / F. Xie - Y. L. Xin / H. D. Xing / Y. Xing / D. R. Xiong - B. N. Xu / C. Y. Xu / D. L. Xu / R. X. Xu - S. S. Xu / L. Xue / D. H. Yan / T. Yan - C. Yang / C. Y. Yang / F. F. Yang / L. L. Yang - M. J. Yang / R. Z. Yang / W. X. Yang / Z. H. Yang - Z. G. Yao / X. A. Ye / L. Q. Yin / N. Yin - X. H. You / Z. Y. You / Y. H. Yu / Q. Yuan - W. M. Yuan / H. Yue / H. D. Zeng / T. X. Zeng - W. Zeng / X. T. Zeng / M. Zha / B. Zhang - B. B. Zhang / B. T. Zhang / C. Zhang / **H. Zhang** - H. M. Zhang / H. Y. Zhang / J. Zhang / J. L. Zhang - J. Y. Zhang / L. Y. Zhang / Li Zhang / P. F. Zhang - R. Zhang / R. Y. Zhang / S. R. Zhang / S. S. Zhang - S. Y. Zhang / W. Zhang / X. Zhang / X. L. Zhang - X. P. Zhang / Yi Zhang / Yong Zhang / Z. P. Zhang - H. S. Zhao / J. Zhao / L. Zhao / L. Z. Zhao - X. H. Zhao / F. Zheng / T. C. Zheng / B. Zhou - H. Zhou / J. N. Zhou / L. Zhou / M. Zhou - P. Zhou / R. Zhou / X. X. Zhou / X. X. Zhou - B. Y. Zhu / C. G. Zhu / F. R. Zhu / H. Zhu - K. J. Zhu / Y. F. Zhu / Z. F. Zhu / Y. C. Zou - X. Zuo ### Summary Pulsar wind nebulae (PWNe) are major cosmic ray accelerators, yet the mechanisms transporting high-energy particles into the interstellar medium remain elusive. Building on the LHAASO discovery of an ultra-high-energy (UHE) $γ$-ray source near the bow-shock PWN powered by the pulsar PSR J1740+1000, we present a joint Einstein Probe (EP) and LHAASO study of this system. EP observations reveal an extended X-ray tail far exceeding the structure previously seen by XMM-Newton. Updated LHAASO observations show that the $γ$-ray emission is elongated, with its major axis aligned with the extended X-ray tail revealed by EP. This is the first detection of an X-ray pulsar tail associated with a spatially coincident extended UHE $γ$-ray emission. The X-ray and $γ$-ray spectrum can be well explained with a single population of relativistic electrons via synchrotron and inverse Compton radiation, respectively, removing the need for particle re-acceleration during propagation. The results unambiguously show that electrons/positrons above 100 TeV are escaping from the PWN. Instead of the immediate, isotropic diffusion into ambient interstellar medium that is typically assumed, these particles are transported anisotropically over at least $\sim$10 pc, either guided by the background magnetic field or carried by an advective outflow. ## Closing the loop on-sky with a vector-Zernike wavefront sensor using a convolutional neural network as phase reconstructor [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07379v1) ### Authors - Francisco Oyarzún / **Mathieu Motte** / Cedric-Taissir Heritier / Benjamin González - Rodrigo Muñoz / **Vincent Chambouleyron** / Marie Angelie Alagao / Arnaud Striffling - Mettoe Pasinetti / **Edvardas Vinerskas** / Pauline Trouve-Peloux / Frederic Champagnat - **Thierry Fusco** / **Benoit Neichel** ### Summary Context: The new giant segmented mirror telescopes will use adaptive optics to reach the fundamental limits in resolving power. To accomplish this, new wavefront sensors (WFS) have been designed to fulfill the requirements, but they may require non-linear reconstruction techniques to operate given the nature of the signal of the WFSs Aims: In this article we show that it is possible to use non-linear reconstructors to extend the dynamic range of one of the most sensitive wavefront sensors far beyond the designed limits: the Zernike wavefront sensor (ZWFS). Methods: We trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) completely in simulation to perform the phase reconstruction of a vector-ZWFS (v-ZWFS), a higher dynamic-range variant of the ZWFS. Contrary to the linear method, the CNN uses the information across the full frame to reconstruct the phase at each point, enabling it to resolve the ambiguities introduced by the periodic response of the ZWFS and thereby extend its effective capture range. We developed a two-step training strategy that ensured closed-loop stability and used a physically informed loss function to maximize the performance of the CNN. Results: We successfully closed the loop on-sky with the v-ZWFS using the CNN in observing conditions that the linear reconstructor could not converge to a stable flat wavefront. In cases where both reconstruction methods were working, the CNN outperformed the linear method in almost all cases, and in favorable seeing conditions we were even able to close the loop with the ZWFS acting as a first stage WFS, highlighting the extended dynamic range brought by the use of a non-linear wavefront reconstructor. Conclusions: We conclude that the use of non-linear wavefront reconstructor can extend the use cases of adaptive optics systems, especially when the WFS used shows highly non-linear behaviors. ## WST, the Wide-field Spectroscopic Telescope: dispersing elements [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07284v1) ### Authors - Andrea Bianco / Michele Frangiamore / Anna Brucalassi / **Dimitri Buffat** - Corentin Cudennec / **Kjetil Dohlen** / Alexandre Jeanneau / David Lee - Will Saunders / Andrea Tozzi ### Summary The Wide-field Spectroscopic Telescope (WST) is a proposed 12-m class facility entirely dedicated to spectroscopic surveys, combining a high-multiplex multi-object spectrograph operating at low (MOS-LR) and high (MOS-HR) spectral resolution with a giant panoramic integral-field spectrograph (IFS), all three operating in parallel. Diffraction gratings are the key dispersing elements of all three instruments and, given the very large number and size of the units required, drive critical trade-offs in throughput, feasibility and production cost. This paper reviews the two grating technologies under consideration for WST, Volume Phase Holographic Gratings (VPHG) and binary (lithographic, surface-relief) gratings, summarizing their working principles and the parameters that control their diffraction efficiency. We then present the current baseline grating parameters and vendor results for each instrument: low-dispersion, VPHGs for the IFS; a four-arm GRISM layout for MOS-LR; and two competing high-resolution disperser architectures (8M16D and 16M4D) for MOS-HR, where binary gratings show a promising path to diffraction efficiencies beyond what is achievable with VPHGs. We conclude with the main open challenges, chiefly the mass production of hundreds of grating units within cost and schedule and the next steps foreseen to consolidate the disperser baseline for WST. ## The JWST Early Release Science Program for Direct Observations of Exoplanetary Systems VIII: patchy forsterite and enstatite clouds in the atmosphere of VHS 1256 b, retrieval lessons learned and outlook to the future [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06583v1) ### Authors - Niall Whiteford / Jacqueline K. Faherty / Ben Burningham / Johanna M. Vos - Simon Petrus / Polychronis Patapis / Beth A. Biller / Andrew Skemer - Sasha Hinkley / Emily Calamari / Genaro Suárez / Kelle L. Cruz - Brittany E. Miles / Aarynn L. Carter / Francisco A. Martinez / Melanie J. Rowland - Olivier Absil / Arthur D. Adams / William O. Balmer / Anthony Boccaletti - Mariangela Bonavita / Mickaël Bonnefoy / Mark Booth / Brendan P. Bowler - Zackery W. Briesemeister / Marta L. Bryan / Per Calissendorff / Faustine Cantalloube - Benjamin Charnay / Gaël Chauvin / Christine H. Chen / **Elodie Choquet** - Valentin Christiaens / Gabriele Cugno / Thayne Currie / Camilla Danielski - Matthew De Furio / Trent J. Dupuy / Samuel M. Factor / Michael P. Fitzgerald - Jonathan J. Fortney / Kyle Franson / Julien H. Girard / Eileen C. Gonzales - Carol A. Grady / Thomas Henning / Dean C. Hines / Callie E. Hood - Kielan K. W. Hoch / Alex R. Howe / Markus Janson / Paul Kalas - Jens Kammerer / Grant M. Kennedy / Pierre Kervella / Minjae Kim - Daniel Kitzmann / Adam L. Kraus / Masayuki Kuzuhara / Pierre-Olivier Lagage - Anne-Marie Lagrange / Kellen Lawson / Cecilia Lazzoni / Jarron M. Leisenring - Ben W. P. Lew / Michael C. Liu / Pengyu Liu / Jorge Llop-Sayson - James P. Lloyd / Anna Lueber / Bruce Macintosh / Mathilde Mâlin - Elena Manjavacas / Sebastián Marino / Mark S. Marley / Christian Marois - Raquel A. Martinez / Elisabeth C. Matthews / Brenda C. Matthews / Dimitri Mawet - Johan Mazoyer / Michael W. McElwain / Stanimir Metchev / Michael R. Meyer - Maxwell A. Millar-Blanchaer / Paul Mollière / Sarah E. Moran / Caroline V. Morley - Sagnick Mukherjee / Paulina Palma-Bifani / Eric Pantin / Marshall D. Perrin - Laurent Pueyo / Sascha P. Quanz / Andreas Quirrenbach / Shrishmoy Ray - Isabel Rebollido / Jea Adams Redai / Bin B. Ren / Emily Rickman - Steph Sallum / Matthias Samland / Benjamin Sargent / Joshua E. Schlieder - Karl R. Stapelfeldt / Jordan M. Stone / Ben J. Sutlieff / Motohide Tamura - Xianyu Tan / Christopher A. Theissen / Pascal Tremblin / Taichi Uyama - Malavika Vasist / **Arthur Vigan** / Kevin Wagner / Jason J. Wang - Kimberly Ward-Duong / Schuyler G. Wolff / Kadin Worthen / Mark C. Wyatt - Marie Ygouf / Alice Zurlo / Xi Zhang / Keming Zhang - Zhoujian Zhang / Yifan Zhou ### Summary JWST defines a new era for the data-driven approach of retrieval modelling, which has become a cornerstone tool for the statistical inference of exoplanetary and brown dwarf properties. The Early Release Science program #1386 observations of VHS 1256 b represent a huge jump in data quality, data quantity and spectral coverage for such objects. VHS 1256 b is a young, planetary mass and extremely variable companion that populates the enigmatic L/T cohort of substellar atmospheres. In this first retrieval analysis of the full 1 - 18 micron dataset, we apply the Brewster retrieval framework to the NIRSpec and MIRI spectroscopic observations of VHS 1256 b, exploring a variety of cloud species and structures. Using Delta(BIC) we find that the data is best described by a forsterite (Mg$_{2}$SiO$_{4}$) and enstatite (MgSiO$_{3}$) cloud combination. Our analysis shows a strong preference for patchy silicate cloud coverage, which aligns with VHS 1256 b's extensive and well documented spectral variability. Our retrieval is able to place constraints on the abundances of H$_{2}$O, CO, CO$_{2}$, CH$_{4}$ as well as NH$_{3}$. We also show that the retrieved parameters are sensitive to the data used and the relative signal-to-noise ratios between data from different instruments. We conclude with the next steps for the wider retrieval community to better understand young and cloudy exoplanetary atmospheres. ## A unified modeling of X-ray and gamma-ray spectro-polarimetric data: the case of Cygnus X-1 [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06328v1) ### Authors - Tristan Bouchet / Thomas Siegert / Victoria Grinberg / Jérôme Rodriguez - Floriane Cangemi / **Philippe Laurent** / Joern Wilms ### Summary Recent X-ray and soft gamma-ray spectro-polarimetric observations of black hole X-ray binaries, such as Cygnus X-1, reveal discrepancies that challenge current models of accretion and high-energy emission. We present a general framework for broadband spectro-polarimetric modeling that simultaneously fits spectral and polarization data from independent instruments across different energy bands. The method robustly combines measurements with different energy binning and statistical significance while accounting for energy-dependent polarization mixing between model components. Applied to Cygnus X-1 over the 2 keV-2 MeV range, it provides an improved characterization of the soft gamma-ray hard-tail and constrains the optically thin synchrotron cutoff energy to $(3.9^{+0.6}_{-0.5}) \times 10^{2}$ keV. We discuss the implications for non-thermal electron acceleration in the context of Bohm diffusion and synchrotron cooling, and propose a new explanation for the observed polarization misalignment based on magnetic field helicity and Doppler boosting. The framework is broadly applicable to multi-instrument spectro-polarimetric analyses. ## Proof of concept of the COSMOCal project at the IRAM 30m telescope [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05395v1) ### Authors - S. Savorgnano / L. Bizzarri / A. Ritacco / J. Aumont - F. Boulanger / A. Catalano / F. Cuttaia / **A. Denis** - F.-X. Désert / D. González Ovejero / S. Leclercq / J.-F. Macías-Pérez - B. Maffei / M. Migliaccio / L. Montier / P. Morfin - L. Mousset / M. Murgia / F. Nati / P. Ortu - M. Pérault / G. Pisano / T. Pisanu / N. Ponthieu - L. Terenzi / J. Treuttel / L. Vacher / M. Zannoni ### Summary This work reports on a test campaign conducted at the IRAM 30m telescope to validate the COSMOCal instrument, a novel concept for absolute calibration of polarization angle, beam properties, and instrumental efficiency. The development is motivated by the stringent calibration requirements of current and next-generation Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) experiments, whose goal is the precise measurement of CMB polarization. Such measurements are essential to probe fundamental physics, including the possible imprint of primordial inflation. The COSMOCal concept is designed as a space-borne calibration reference intended to provide a stable and absolute polarized signal observable simultaneously by multiple large-aperture ground-based observatories. Prior to any space deployment, a terrestrial prototype was developed and characterized in the laboratory, as reported in Ritacco et al. 2024. The results presented here describe the first validation of the system coupled to an antenna, carried out at the IRAM 30m telescope in September 2024. This campaign aimed at assessing the performance of the full instrument under realistic observational conditions, including its ability to reconstruct polarization observables and interface with a state-of-the-art millimeter-wave polarimeter. ## Characterization of the MUSE NFM PSF as a function of atmospheric conditions: TipTop calibration [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.04819v1) ### Authors - Enrico Congiu / Fuyan Bian / Carlo F. Manara / Arseniy Kuznetsov - Guido Agapito / Johanna Hartke / Timo Kravtsov / **Lisa-Marie Mazzolo** - Fabio Rossi / Cedric Plantet / Fernando Selman ### Summary The Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) achieves exceptional spatial resolution in narrow-field mode (NFM) thanks to the GALACSI adaptive optics (AO) system. However, limitations in point spread function (PSF) characterization still hinder the full exploitation of its capabilities. In particular, the current exposure time calculator (ETC) lacks an accurate PSF model, preventing users from reliably predicting the signal-to-noise ratio of NFM observations during proposal preparation. To address this limitation, we analyzed a large set of archival standard-star observations to quantify how NFM PSF properties vary with observing conditions, including airmass, seeing, coherence time, wind speed, and wavelength. We then used this reference dataset to calibrate TipTop, a fast AO PSF simulation tool that will be integrated into the next release of the MUSE NFM ETC. Our results demonstrate that calibration against real on-sky data is essential for accurate PSF modeling. In particular, we find that reproducing realistic PSFs requires both an additional static aberration term and an airmass-dependent tip-tilt jitter component. The calibration performs well at wavelengths longer than 7000 A, while additional corrections are still required at shorter wavelengths, likely due to unmodeled chromatic aberrations. Once implemented in the ETC, this tool will provide condition-dependent NFM PSF predictions and more reliable signal-to-noise estimates. ## A catalogue of high angular resolution and contrast polarimetric maps of 45 nearby AGB stars with SPHERE/ZIMPOL [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02410v1) ### Authors - Nekolgne Aymard Badolo / Eric Lagadec / Mamadou N'Diaye / Sie Zacharie Kam - Iain McDonald / Alexis Matter / Jean Koulidiati / Lyu Abe - Marcel Carbillet / **Thierry Fusco** ### Summary We present the largest catalogue of asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars, 45 targets in total, observed in polarized light at high angular resolution (~ 20 milliarcsec). The main goal of the study is to detect and characterize dust shells in the close environment of nearby AGB stars. This work also aims to systematically classify the AGB star circumstellar morphologies obtained with the SPHERE instrument installed at the Very Large Telescope (VLT), thanks to its Zurich Imaging Polarimeter (ZIMPOL). We extracted and analyzed polarized intensity maps for 45 AGB stars, constructed from polarimetric observation data obtained with the SPHERE/ZIMPOL instrument. An ellipse fitting method was applied to characterize the circumstellar envelopes. Stellar parameters (luminosity, effective temperature, surface gravity, extinction, metallicity) were compiled and recalculated when necessary from spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting using the Python SED fitting tool (PySSED) software. These data were then used to train a random forest machine learning model to determine the most discriminating variables for a resolved envelope around a given star. We constructed polarization maps for all stars in the sample, revealing a wide diversity of circumstellar morphologies. We detected 16 dusty circumstellar envelopes, including three never observed before. They display a wide range of morphologies, all of them showing a clear departure from spherical symmetry, indicating interaction with a companion or asymmetric mass ejections. The random forest model identified optimal thresholds for several physical parameters, thus providing robust criteria to anticipate SPHERE's ability to resolve dust envelopes around AGB stars. These results facilitate the selection of targets for future observations and contribute to a better understanding of the evolution mechanisms of circumstellar envelopes.