# Articles for week 7 2026 ## LHAASO observation of Mrk 421 during 2021 March - 2024 March: a comprehensive VHE catalog of multi-timescale outbursts and its time average behavior [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13411v1) ### Authors - The LHAASO Collaboration / Zhen Cao / F. Aharonian / Y. X. Bai - Y. W. Bao / D. Bastieri / X. J. Bi / Y. J. Bi - W. Bian / J. Blunier / A. V. Bukevich / C. M. Cai - Y. Y. Cai / W. Y. Cao / Zhe Cao / J. Chang - J. F. Chang / E. S. Chen / G. H. Chen / H. K. Chen - L. F. Chen / Liang Chen / Long Chen / M. J. Chen - M. L. Chen / Q. H. Chen / S. Chen / S. H. Chen - S. Z. Chen / T. L. Chen / X. B. Chen / X. J. Chen - X. P. Chen / Y. Chen / N. Cheng / Q. Y. Cheng - Y. D. Cheng / M. Y. Cui / S. W. Cui / X. H. Cui - Y. D. Cui / B. Z. Dai / H. L. Dai / Z. G. Dai - Danzengluobu / Y. X. Diao / A. J. Dong / X. Q. Dong - K. K. Duan / J. H. Fan / Y. Z. Fan / J. Fang - J. H. Fang / K. Fang / C. F. Feng / H. Feng - L. Feng / S. H. Feng / X. T. Feng / Y. Feng - Y. L. Feng / S. Gabici / B. Gao / Q. Gao - W. Gao / W. K. Gao / M. M. Ge / T. T. Ge - L. S. Geng / G. Giacinti / G. H. Gong / Q. B. Gou - M. H. Gu / F. L. Guo / J. Guo / K. J. Guo - X. L. Guo / Y. Q. Guo / Y. Y. Guo / R. P. Han - O. A. Hannuksela / M. Hasan / H. H. He / H. N. He - J. Y. He / X. Y. He / Y. He / S. Hernández-Cadena - B. W. Hou / C. Hou / X. Hou / H. B. Hu - S. C. Hu / C. Huang / D. H. Huang / J. J. Huang - X. L. Huang / X. T. Huang / X. Y. Huang / Y. Huang - Y. Y. Huang / A. Inventar / X. L. Ji / H. Y. Jia - K. Jia / H. B. Jiang / K. Jiang / X. W. Jiang - Z. J. Jiang / M. Jin / S. Kaci / M. M. Kang - I. Karpikov / D. Khangulyan / D. Kuleshov / K. Kurinov - Cheng Li / Cong Li / D. Li / F. Li - H. B. Li / H. C. Li / Jian Li / Jie Li - K. Li / L. Li / R. L. Li / S. D. Li - T. Y. Li / W. L. Li / X. R. Li / Y. Li - Zhe Li / Zhuo Li / E. W. Liang / Y. F. Liang - S. J. Lin / B. Liu / C. Liu / D. Liu - D. B. Liu / H. Liu / J. Liu / J. L. Liu - J. R. Liu / M. Y. Liu / R. Y. Liu / S. M. Liu - W. Liu / X. Liu / Y. Liu / Y. Liu - Y. N. Liu / Y. Q. Lou / Q. Luo / Y. Luo - H. K. Lv / B. Q. Ma / L. L. Ma / X. H. Ma - I. O. Maliy / J. R. Mao / Z. Min / W. Mitthumsiri - Y. Mizuno / G. B. Mou / A. Neronov / K. C. Y. Ng - M. Y. Ni / L. Nie / L. J. Ou / Z. W. Ou - P. Pattarakijwanich / Z. Y. Pei / D. Y. Peng / J. C. Qi - M. Y. Qi / J. J. Qin / D. Qu / A. Raza - C. Y. Ren / D. Ruffolo / A. Sáiz / D. Savchenko - D. Semikoz / L. Shao / O. Shchegolev / Y. Z. Shen - X. D. Sheng / Z. D. Shi / F. W. Shu / H. C. Song - Yu. V. Stenkin / Y. Su / D. X. Sun / H. Sun - J. X. Sun / Q. N. Sun / X. N. Sun / Z. B. Sun - N. H. Tabasam / J. Takata / P. H. T. Tam / H. B. Tan - Q. W. Tang / R. Tang / Z. B. Tang / W. W. Tian - C. N. Tong / L. H. Wan / C. Wang / D. H. Wang - G. W. Wang / H. G. Wang / J. C. Wang / K. Wang - Kai Wang / Kai Wang / L. P. Wang / L. Y. Wang - L. Y. Wang / R. Wang / W. Wang / X. G. Wang - X. J. Wang / X. Y. Wang / Y. Wang / Y. D. Wang - Z. H. Wang / Z. X. Wang / Zheng Wang / D. M. Wei - J. J. Wei / Y. J. Wei / T. Wen / S. S. Weng - C. Y. Wu / H. R. Wu / Q. W. Wu / S. Wu - X. F. Wu / Y. S. Wu / S. Q. Xi / J. Xia - J. J. Xia / G. M. Xiang / D. X. Xiao / G. Xiao - Y. F. Xiao / Y. L. Xin / H. D. Xing / Y. Xing - D. R. Xiong / B. N. Xu / C. Y. Xu / D. L. Xu - R. F. Xu / R. X. Xu / S. S. Xu / W. L. Xu - L. Xue / D. H. Yan / T. Yan / C. W. Yang - C. Y. Yang / F. F. Yang / L. L. Yang / M. J. Yang - R. Z. Yang / W. X. Yang / Z. H. Yang / Z. G. Yao - X. A. Ye / L. Q. Yin / N. Yin / X. H. You - Z. Y. You / Q. Yuan / H. Yue / H. D. Zeng - T. X. Zeng / W. Zeng / X. T. Zeng / M. Zha - B. B. Zhang / B. T. Zhang / C. Zhang / **H. Zhang** - H. M. Zhang / H. Y. Zhang / J. L. Zhang / J. Y. Zhang - Li Zhang / P. F. Zhang / R. Zhang / S. R. Zhang - S. S. Zhang / S. Y. Zhang / W. Zhang / W. Y. Zhang - X. Zhang / X. P. Zhang / Yi Zhang / Yong Zhang - Z. P. Zhang / J. Zhao / L. Zhao / L. Z. Zhao - S. P. Zhao / X. H. Zhao / Z. H. Zhao / F. Zheng - T. C. Zheng / B. Zhou / H. Zhou / J. N. Zhou - M. Zhou / P. Zhou / R. Zhou / X. X. Zhou - X. X. Zhou / B. Y. Zhu / C. G. Zhu / F. R. Zhu - H. Zhu / K. J. Zhu / Y. C. Zou / X. Zuo ### Summary The Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) monitors sources within its field of view for up to 7 hours daily, achieving a duty cycle exceeding 98% and an annual point-source sensitivity of 1.5% Crab Units (CU) in the very high energy (VHE) band. This unbiased sky-survey mode facilitates systematic monitoring and investigation of outburst phenomena. In this paper, we present results from an unprecedented three-year monitoring campaign (March 2021--March 2024) of Mrk421 using LHAASO, spanning energies from 0.4 TeV to 20 TeV. We find that the blazar stayed in a quiescent state in 2021 and became active starting in 2022 with a total of 23 VHE outburst events identified, where the highest observed daily significance reaches $20\,σ$ with a flux equivalent to approximately 3.3~CU. LHAASO's continuous monitoring suggests the flaring occupancy of Mrk~421 to be around 14%. During long-term monitoring, multiwavelength (MWL) variability and correlation analyses are conducted using complementary data from Fermi-LAT, MAXI-GSC, Swift-XRT, and ZTF. A significant correlation ($>3\,σ$) is observed between X-ray and VHE bands with no detectable time lag, while the correlation between GeV and TeV bands is weaker. The flux distribution of the TeV emission during the quiescent state is different from that in the active state, implying the existence of two modes of energy dissipation in the blazar jet. Using simultaneous MWL data, we also analyzed both the long-term and outburst-period SEDs, and discussed the possible origin of the outburst events. ## ARCHITECTS II: Impact of subgrid physics on the observable properties of the circumgalactic medium [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13394v1) ### Authors - Maxime Rey / Jérémy Blaizot / Taysun Kimm / Joakim Rosdahl - **Léo Michel-Dansac** / Valentin Mauerhofer ### Summary Galaxy evolution is driven by star formation and stellar feedback on scales unresolved by current high-resolution cosmological simulations, requiring robust subgrid models. However, these models remain degenerate, often calibrated primarily to match observed stellar masses. To explore these degeneracies, we conduct three state-of-the-art cosmological zoom-in simulations of the same galaxy, each incorporating different subgrid models: mechanical feedback, a combination of mechanical and thermal feedback, and delayed cooling. We compare their circumgalactic media (CGM) through quasar absorption sightlines of HI, MgII, CIV, and OVI. Our findings demonstrate that despite producing galaxies with the same stellar masses, the models lead to distinct feedback modes and CGM properties. Column densities and covering fractions serve as effective diagnostics of subgrid models, with all four ions providing strong constraints as they trace diverse gas phases, exhibit complementary spatial distributions, and originate from different mechanisms. Although all simulations bracket observed column density distributions, direct comparisons are limited by scarce detections and significant scatter in absorption strengths. Covering fractions of weak absorbers provides the most robust constraints. All models fail to reproduce HI and MgII covering fractions, and delayed cooling overproduces OVI covering fractions, while the other models underproduce them. The simulation including mechanical feedback reproduces the observed CIV covering fractions well, whereas the other models show slight offsets. We argue that this discrepancy is likely driven by unresolved thermal structures for HI and MgII, and insufficient metals for CIV and OVI, arising from missing physics such as AGNs or cosmic rays. ## ARCHITECTS I: Impact of subgrid physics on the simulated properties of the circumgalactic medium [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13392v1) ### Authors - Maxime Rey / Jérémy Blaizot / Taysun Kimm / Joakim Rosdahl - **Léo Michel-Dansac** ### Summary Galaxy evolution is shaped by star formation and stellar feedback at scales unresolved by current high-resolution cosmological simulations. Precise subgrid models are thus necessary, and different approaches have been developed. However, they are degenerate and often primarily calibrated to reproduce stellar masses from observations. To explore these degeneracies, we perform three cosmological zoom-in radiation-hydrodynamics simulations of the same galaxy within a $5\times10^{11}\rm\ M_\odot$ dark matter halo at $z\sim1$, each with a different subgrid model: mechanical feedback, a combination of mechanical feedback and thermal feedback, and delayed cooling. We calibrate the simulations to match in stellar mass, isolating the effect of the models on the circumgalactic medium (CGM). Our findings demonstrate that despite producing galaxies with comparable stellar masses, the three models lead to distinct feedback modes, resulting in notable variations in the CGM properties. The delayed cooling run is dominated by ejective feedback and exhibits high burstiness, whereas mechanical and the hybrid models primarily feature preventive feedback, respectively acting at the galaxy and halo scales. Delayed cooling reduces the baryon mass to half the universal baryon fraction while mechanical feedback retains most baryons, with the hybrid model standing in between. Delayed cooling also ejects significantly more metals into the CGM than both other models. While for delayed cooling and mechanical feedback metals are almost evenly distributed in the CGM, they are concentrated around satellites in the hybrid model. These discrepancies emphasize the need to design an appropriate subgrid model to understand how stellar feedback regulates galaxy growth. ## Gas-depleted planet formation occurred in the four-planet system around the red dwarf LHS 1903 [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11271v1) ### Authors - Thomas G. Wilson / Anna M. Simpson / Andrew Collier Cameron / Ryan Cloutier - Vardan Adibekyan / Ancy Anna John / Yann Alibert / Manu Stalport - Jo Ann Egger / Andrea Bonfanti / Nicolas Billot / Pascal Guterman - Pierre F. L. Maxted / Attila E. Simon / Sergio G. Sousa / Malcolm Fridlund - Mathias Beck / Anja Bekkelien / Sebastien Salmon / Valerie Van Grootel - Luca Fossati / Alexander James Mustill / Hugh P. Osborn / Tiziano Zingales - Matthew J. Hooton / Laura Affer / Suzanne Aigrain / Roi Alonso - Guillem Anglada / Alexandros Antoniadis-Karnavas / Tamas Barczy / David Barrado Navascues - Susana C. C. Barros / Wolfgang Baumjohann / Thomas Beck / Willy Benz - Federico Biondi / Xavier Bonfils / Luca Borsato / Alexis Brandeker - Christopher Broeg / Lars A. Buchhave / Maximilian Buder / Juan Cabrera - Sebastian Carrazco Gaxiola / David Charbonneau / Sebastien Charnoz / David R. Ciardi - Karen A. Collins / Kevin I. Collins / Rosario Cosentino / Szilard Csizmadia - Patricio E. Cubillos / Shweta Dalal / Mario Damasso / James R. A. Davenport - Melvyn B. Davies / **Magali Deleuil** / Laetitia Delrez / Olivier D. S. Demangeon - Brice-Olivier Demory / Victoria DiTomasso / Diana Dragomir / Courtney D. Dressing - Xavier Dumusque / David Ehrenreich / Anders Erikson / Emma Esparza-Borges - Andrea Fortier / Izuru Fukuda / Akihiko Fukui / Davide Gandolfi - Adriano Ghedina / Steven Giacalone / Holden Gill / Michael Gillon - Yilen Gomez Maqueo Chew / Manuel Gudel / Pere Guerra / Maximilian N. Gunther - **Nathan Hara** / Avet Harutyunyan / Yuya Hayashi / Raphaelle D. Haywood - Rae Holcomb / Keith Horne / **Sergio Hoyer** / Chelsea X. Huang - Masahiro Ikoma / Kate G. Isaak / James A. G. Jackman / Jon M. Jenkins - Eric L. N. Jensen / Daniel Jontof-Hutter / Yugo Kawai / Laszlo L. Kiss - Ben S. Lakeland / Jacques Laskar / David W. Latham / Alain Lecavelier des Etangs - Adrien Leleu / Monika Lendl / Jerome de Leon / Florian Lienhard - Mercedes Lopez-Morales / Christophe Lovis / Michael B. Lund / Rafael Luque - Demetrio Magrin / Luca Malavolta / Aldo F. Martınez Fiorenzano / Andrew W. Mayo - Michel Mayor / Christoph Mordasini / Annelies Mortier / Felipe Murgas - Norio Narita / Valerio Nascimbeni / Belinda A. Nicholson / Goran Olofsson - Roland Ottensamer / Isabella Pagano / Larissa Palethorpe / Enric Palle - Hannu Parviainen / Marco Pedani / Francesco A. Pepe / Gisbert Peter - Matteo Pinamonti / Giampaolo Piotto / Don Pollacco / Ennio Poretti - Didier Queloz / Samuel N. Quinn / Roberto Ragazzoni / Nicola Rando - David Rapetti / Francesco Ratti / Heike Rauer / Federica Rescigno - Ignasi Ribas / Ken Rice / George R. Ricker / Paul Robertson - Thierry de Roche / Laurence Sabin / Nuno C. Santos / Dimitar D. Sasselov - Arjun B. Savel / Gaetano Scandariato / Nicole Schanche / Urs Schroffenegger - Richard P. Schwarz / Sara Seager / Ramotholo Sefako / Damien Segransan - Avi Shporer / Andre M. Silva / Alexis M. S. Smith / Alessandro Sozzetti - Manfred Steller / Gyula M. Szabo / Motohide Tamura / Nicolas Thomas - Amy Tuson / Stephane Udry / Andrew Vanderburg / Roland K. Vanderspek - Julia Venturini / Francesco Verrecchia / Nicholas A. Walton / Christopher A. Watson - Robert D. Wells / Joshua N. Winn / Roberto Zambelli / Carl Ziegler ### Summary Small exoplanet radii show two populations, referred to as super-Earths and sub-Neptunes, separated by a gap known as the radius valley. This may be produced by the removal of atmospheres due to stellar or internal heating, or lack of an initial envelope. We us transit photometry and radial velocity measurements to detect and characterize four planets orbiting LHS 1903, a red dwarf (M-dwarf) star in the Milky Way's thick disk. The planets have orbital periods between 2.2 and 29.3 days, and span the radius valley within a single planetary system. The derived densities indicate that LHS 1903 b is rocky, while LHS 1903 c and LHS 1903 d have extended atmospheres. Although the most distant planet from the host star, LHS 1903 e, has no gaseous envelope, indicating it formed from gas-depleted material. ## Cold and eccentric: a high-spectral resolution view of 51 Eri b with VLT/HiRISE [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10260v1) ### Authors - **A. Denis** / **A. Vigan** / G. Chauvin / A. Lacquement - H. Beust / M. Ravet / J. Costes / A. Radcliffe - S. Martos / W. Balmer / T. Stolkern / P. Palma Bifani - B. Rajpoot / A. Simonnin / S. Petrus / T. Forveille - M. Janson / A. Reiners / **N. Godoy** / D. Cont - L. Nortmann / K. Hoy / A. Zurlo / H. Anwand-Heerwart - **Y. Charles** / **A. Costille** / M. El Morsy / **J. Garcia** - M. Houllé / M. Lopez / G. Murray / E. Muslimov - G. P. P. L. Otten / J. Paufique / M. Phillips / U. Seemann - A. Viret / G. Zins ### Summary Discovered almost 10 years ago, the giant planet 51 Eridani b is one of the least separated (0.2 arcsec) and faintest (J = 19.74 mag) directly imaged exoplanets known to date. Its atmospheric properties have been thoroughly investigated through low- and medium-resolution spectroscopic observations, enabling robust characterization of the planet's bulk parameters. However, the planet's intrinsically high contrast renders high-resolution spectroscopic observations difficult, despite their potential to yield key measurements essential for a more comprehensive characterization. This study seeks to constrain the planet's radial velocity, enabling a full 3D orbital solution when integrated with previous measurements. We have obtained 4 high-contrast high-resolution (R = 140000) spectroscopic datasets of the planet, collected over a two-year interval with the HiRISE visitor instrument at the VLT to derive the planet's radial velocity. Using self-consistent models of atmosphere, we were able to derive the radial velocity of the planet at each of the 4 epochs. These radial velocity measurements were then used in combination with all existing relative astrometry in order to constrain the orbit of the planet. Our radial velocity measurements allow us to break the degeneracy along the line of sight, making it now possible the unambiguous interpretation of the phase curve of the companion. We further constrain the orbital parameters, particularly the eccentricity, for which we derive e = 0.55 (-0.07, +0.03). The relatively high eccentricity indicates that the system has experienced dynamical interactions induced by an external perturber. We place constraints on the mass and semi-major axis of a hypothetical, unseen outer planet capable of producing the observed high eccentricities. ## In-flight calibration of the INTEGRAL/IBIS Compton mode: Application to the Crab Nebula polarization [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09886v1) ### Authors - Tristan Bouchet / **Philippe Laurent** / Floriane Cangemi / Jérôme Rodriguez ### Summary The INTEGRAL satellite explored the gamma-ray sky since its launch on October 17, 2002, and until the end of its scientific operation on February 28, 2025. A large fraction of the available data is still largely untouched, due to the complexity of analysis. We describe the latest in-flight calibration of the Compton mode of the INTEGRAL/IBIS telescope, taking into account more than twenty years of data. The spectroscopy and polarization of the standard candle that is the Crab Nebula is analyzed in detail. We operate the IBIS telescope as a Coded mask Compton telescope, using the Crab Nebula to refine the calibration, as is usually done for high-energy instruments. We have determined the spectroscopic and polarimetric properties of the IBIS Compton mode and their evolution along the entire duration of the mission. In addition, the long-term evolution of the Crab Nebula's polarization has been successfully measured and compared with other high-energy experiments. We could estimate the energy dependence of the Crab Nebula polarization in four bands between 200 keV and 1 MeV. In particular, the detection of polarized emissions strictly above 400 keV makes it the highest energy measurement ever performed for the Crab Nebula. A Python library was also made publicly available to analyze processed data. ## The Pollux European instrument concept for HWO: a high-resolution spectrograph and spectropolarimeter from the far-UV to the near-IR [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09828v1) ### Authors - Coralie Neiner / **Jean-Claude Bouret** / Luca Fossati / **David le Mignant** - Eduard Muslimov / Ana Ines Gomez de Castro / Frédéric Marin ### Summary Pollux is a high-resolution spectrograph and spectropolarimeter working from 100 nm to 1.8 microns proposed for HWO by a European consortium. Pollux will allow us to study stellar and (exo)planetary systems, as well as cosmic ecosystems. For example, Pollux will provide new insights on exoplanet formation and evolution, characterization of the atmospheres and magnetospheres of stars and planets, and star-planet interactions. It will also allow us to resolve narrow UV emission and absorption lines, enabling us to follow the baryon cycle over cosmic time -- from galaxies forming stars out of interstellar gas and grains, and planets forming in circumstellar disks, to the various forms of feedback into the interstellar and intergalactic medium -- and from active galactic nuclei. The most innovative characteristic of Pollux is its unique spectropolarimetric capability in the UV, which will open a new parameter space. Its very high spectral resolution (~70000 to ~100000) and stability over a very large wavelength range will also be a major asset. In this paper, we summarize the main scientific drivers of Pollux and present its current design, technological challenges, and the Pollux consortium organization. ## The Nysa family as the main source of unequilibrated LL ordinary chondrites [Link to the paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08732v1) ### Authors - M. Marsset / **P. Vernazza** / M. Brož / C. Avdellidou - C. A. Thomas / L. McGraw / A. Madden-Watson / K. Minker - M. Monnereau / F. E. DeMeo / R. P. Binzel / M. Mahlke - B. Carry / J. Hanuš / P. N. Simon / B. Yang - P. Beck / M. Birlan / E. Jehin ### Summary Context. The origin of the petrologic diversity observed in ordinary chondrites (OCs), the most common meteorites on Earth, remains debated. Competing models invoke either depth-dependent sampling of a single thermally stratified ("onion-shell") parent body or contributions from multiple distinct parent bodies. Aims. We aim to determine which of the two models is preferred for LL chondrites. These are unique among OCs in exhibiting a bimodal petrologic distribution, with most meteorites being LL3 or LL6. Methods. We compare the spectral and mineralogical properties of LL chondrites and corresponding LL-chondrite-like near-Earth objects (NEOs) with their possible sources in the main asteroid belt. We also model the thermal histories of the proposed parent bodies, based on revised estimates of parent-body sizes. Results. The spectral and mineralogical diversity of LL chondrites is consistent with contributions from the bright, S-type component of the Nysa family (NysaS) and the Flora family, with NysaS supplying mainly low-petrologic-type material and Flora higher-grade material. Unequilibrated, LL3 chondrites appear to originate exclusively from NysaS. Similarly, LL-chondrite-like NEOs form two distinct subpopulations consistent with origins in these same families. Conclusions. Our results favour multiple parent bodies for LL chondrites. The petrologic differences between the NysaS and Flora parent bodies indicate that planetesimal accretion within the OC reservoir extended over 0.5-0.7 Myr.